What needs to be done?
Job description
Describes tasks, responsibilities, authority and where the position sits in the organisation.
Method: Requirements analysis
A good requirements analysis defines what a role really needs. It is the foundation for the job ad, the shortlist and every interview. Here you will learn how it works and how to build a candidate profile that holds up in day-to-day work.
A requirements analysis, also called job analysis, systematically describes the tasks a role involves and what someone needs to bring to succeed in it. That includes experience, expertise, skills and behaviours. The result is the candidate profile, also called a job requirements profile: a structured overview of must-have and nice-to-have criteria, weighted by their importance for the role.
In personnel assessment, the requirements analysis is the starting point of every hiring decision. The German standard DIN 33430 for job-related aptitude assessment also puts it first. Only if you know what you are looking for can you compare applications fairly and transparently.
What needs to be done?
Describes tasks, responsibilities, authority and where the position sits in the organisation.
What does someone need to be able to do?
Translates the tasks into competencies and criteria, split into must-have and nice-to-have and weighted.
How do we reach the right people?
Communicates the role to the outside world. It builds on the candidate profile but is written for the target audience.
Many hiring problems do not start in the interview but long before it. If you do not clarify the requirements of a role properly, you may end up looking for the wrong profile.
If it is not clear beforehand what matters, the impression in the interview decides. Clear criteria make candidates comparable.
A bad hire costs time, money and energy in the team. The cause often lies in unclear or poorly weighted requirements.
If you know the role, you can describe it concretely. That attracts the right people and keeps the wrong ones from applying.
The requirements tell you which questions, tasks and methods fit. Your screening then tests exactly what matters.
Hiring managers, the department and recruiting often have different pictures in mind. The analysis brings them together before the first interview.
Objective criteria related to the role protect against discrimination and make decisions explainable. That helps with anti-discrimination law as well as the EU AI Act.
There is no single right method. Good analyses combine several sources, depending on how important and how new the role is.
| Method | How it works | Strength | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experience-based analysis | Conversations with the hiring manager, the team and previous job holders | fast and close to practice | subjective, depends on whom you ask |
| Critical incident technique | Collects concrete situations in which particularly good or poor behaviour showed | very concrete and behaviour-based | time-consuming, needs experienced interviewees |
| Work and task analysis | Observes or documents how the work actually gets done | shows the real working reality | time-intensive, hard for new roles |
| Standardised questionnaires | Job holders and managers rate predefined tasks and requirements | comparable and easy to analyse | not very specific to the individual role |
| Competency model | Derives requirements from a company-wide catalogue of competencies | a shared language across the company | often too generic for the specific position |
In practice, most roles are well served by combining the job description, a structured conversation with the hiring manager and a few critical situations. What matters is ending up with a clear, weighted profile.
Why does the role exist? What should be achieved after twelve months? These questions give every further step a direction.
List the most important tasks and estimate how much time they take and how decisive they are for success.
In which moments does it show whether someone performs well in the role? Concrete situations are the best basis for later questions.
Translate tasks and situations into competencies: technical, methodological, social and personal. Describe observable behaviour.
Separate real requirements from wishes. Weight the criteria so it is clear what tips the balance when in doubt.
Align the profile with the hiring manager and the team. Then decide for each criterion how you will test it: via CV, question, task or interview.
This is what a compact candidate profile can look like. It fits on one page and translates directly into questions and assessment criteria.
Purpose of the role
Lead a team of twelve so that customers get fast and friendly help and service quality improves measurably.
Must-have criteria
Nice-to-have criteria
Competencies and weighting
Critical situations
Ask how you will know after a year that the hire was a success. The most important requirements almost follow by themselves.
Every must-have criterion shrinks the pool of candidates. Three to five real requirements are usually enough.
“Team player” and “resilient” say little. Describe what someone should do in a concrete situation.
Hiring managers, the team and previous job holders see the role differently. The differences are especially revealing.
Check whether a degree is really needed or only stands in for a skill. That opens the search to career changers.
Not every requirement is equally important. Weighting helps you compare candidates with different strengths fairly.
How will the role change over the next two years? New tools, growth or restructuring shift the requirements.
Decide for each criterion how you will recognise it. What cannot be tested will not help you choose.
The role has changed over the years, the ad has not. You end up looking for a profile the team no longer needs.
The list keeps growing until nobody meets it. Good candidates then do not apply at all.
“Strong communicator” means something different to everyone. Without a description of behaviour, everyone assesses by their own standard.
Age limits, “young team” or “native speaker” without an objective reason are risky under anti-discrimination law. Every requirement needs a justification from the role.
If only recruiting or only the hiring manager writes the profile, important views of day-to-day work are missing.
The profile sits in a drawer and interviews still run on gut feeling. It only has an effect once questions and assessment build on it.
The Yeliq approach
At Yeliq, the requirements analysis comes first in every screening process. Yeliq reads the job description, asks recruiting and hiring managers targeted follow-up questions and brings tasks, responsibility, working reality and leadership into a clear role context.
The result is a structured candidate profile that your team reviews and approves. Based on it, Yeliq selects the right modules for the pre-interview flow, for example situational questions, video answers, a work sample or CV analysis. Your screening then collects exactly the signals that matter for this role.
Every role is different. Every role deserves a perfect pre-selection.
How Yeliq worksRequirements analysis in Yeliq with follow-up questions to the hiring manager
Free offer
Leave your name and email address. All we need after that is your job description. We analyse the role with Yeliq and send you detailed results by email.
Free and without obligation. Please remove any confidential details that are not needed for the analysis.
A requirements analysis systematically describes the tasks a role involves and the competencies, experience and behaviours needed to succeed in it. It is the foundation for the job ad, screening and interviews.
The requirements analysis is the process, the candidate profile is its result. The profile summarises the criteria, split into must-have and nice-to-have and weighted by importance for the role.
The purpose of the role, must-have and nice-to-have criteria, the key competencies with their weighting and critical situations from day-to-day work. It also helps to note for each criterion how it will be tested.
Start by clarifying the purpose of the role. Then collect and weight the tasks, describe critical situations and derive competencies from them. Separate must-haves from nice-to-haves and align the profile with the hiring manager and the team.
Must-have criteria are requirements without which someone cannot do the role, such as a specific qualification. Nice-to-have criteria are desirable but not essential. Too many must-haves put good candidates off.
Common methods are conversations with hiring managers and job holders, the critical incident technique, work and task analysis, standardised questionnaires and competency models. For most roles, a combination of job description, structured conversation and critical situations is enough.
Yes. You send us a job description and receive the results by email, free and without obligation. If you like, we will then show you how Yeliq supports your screening based on the analysis.
We use it to create the requirements analysis for your role. The data is processed in accordance with the GDPR. Please remove any confidential details that are not needed for the analysis beforehand.